Agree and Disagree Essay Jan 21, 2023 With Sample Answer

Appeared on IELTS January 21, 2023

Question: Some believe that new science related to criminal forensics should be used to look at old cases.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Write at least 250 words.

Answer:

There are interesting debates surrounding the application of forensic science to reopen old judicial cases. I believe that if there is a good chance of true justice being done, then it is absolutely essential and justified that we consider this option. After all, access to justice is a fundamental right to which every citizen is entitled.

The most significant outcome of taking a second look at old cases based on forensic evidence is the possibility of those wrongly convicted being exonerated for a crime that they were never truly responsible for. One can imagine the joy and happiness this could bring to the families of those wrongly convicted. Moreover, it would also ensure that the actual criminal, who is guilty of the crime, is convicted and punished appropriately. 

We also have cold cases which have been reopened and solved, thanks to forensic science. For instance, there was the case of the murder of a 22-year-old man in Delhi that remained unsolved for 8 long years. Despite the police suspecting that he was killed by his bride and her lover, they could not do anything, for lack of evidence. Finally, the case was resolved only after it was handed over to forensic experts.

In conclusion, my viewpoint is that law enforcement authorities should resort to forensics to reopen and solve the erstwhile, unresolved criminal cases and convict the guilty. Forensic expertise should also be used to reopen old cases, convict the guilty and exonerate the innocent that were accused on account of a lack of genuine evidence. In the ultimate analysis, fair justice is what matters.