New US Student Visa Process in 2025: Social Media, Higher Fees & Limited Waivers
TL;DR
- In 2025, the US resumed student visa interviews with stricter regulations and digital scrutiny. Applicants must now disclose usernames across 20+ social media platforms, with consular officers reviewing posts, likes, and affiliations going back five years.
- Failure to list or forgetting old accounts could result in denial. Fixed-term visas are replacing the “Duration of Status” model, especially affecting PhD students.
- A new $250 “Visa Integrity Fee” adds to existing costs. Interview waivers have been rolled back, and processing times now stretch to months.
- With political speech, protest-related posts, or even memes potentially viewed as visa risks, applicants must clean up their digital presence.
YUNO LEARNING unpacks these sweeping changes—and what students must do to protect their visa chances.
On May 27, 2025, U.S. embassies worldwide paused interviews for student (F, M, J) visa applicants. Three weeks later, on June 18, 2025, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced the resumption … with new rules and new processes. Appointment scheduling remains limited due to resource constraints and vetting load. In other words, applicants must wait much longer for their interview. Also, processing a student visa now takes months because officers are checking applicants’ social media in detail.
While not officially confirmed, State Department sources indicate that consulates may prioritize applicants who have been admitted to institutions with lower international enrollment (less than 15 percent) and may implement tighter scrutiny in the case of students admitted to some universities (e.g., Harvard).
Here are the new rules/processes:
Enhanced social media screening and vetting (must submit handles, public profiles, etc.)
NOTE: Initially, this measure was focused on students admitted to Harvard University and on students from China and Hong Kong. Now the measure has been expanded to include all applicants.
This means
1. Mandatory Disclosure of Social Media Usernames
- Applicants must list all usernames/handles used in the past five years on DS‑160, across ~20 major platforms (e.g., Facebook, Instagram, X/Twitter, YouTube, LinkedIn, Reddit, TikTok)
- DS‑160 includes a menu to add multiple platforms and handles. Applicants must certify their answers under penalty of law
- Missing or misleading information, or any other sort of incomplete disclosure, may be viewed as misrepresentation, leading to denial or ineligibility.
- The requirement extends to the past five years, including deleted or old accounts.
- If applicants forget old usernames, deactivated, or defunct accounts, it may be understood as evasive behavior and negatively affect visa credibility
Verification:
- Consular officers will cross-reference using public profiles, search engines, LexisNexis, and specialized databases
- Any discrepancy between DS-160 entries and discovered profiles could trigger administrative processing or denial.
2. Digital Screening of Applicants’ Online Behavior
Scope of screening
Officers review public posts, comments, likes/shares, group affiliations, and broader online presence found via search engines and third-party platforms (e.g., LexisNexis)
Timeframe
Covers the same 5-year window for usernames and all related online content — including older posts.
Here’s what consular officers will find “objectionable” …
- Applicant’s social media shows hostility toward the United States 🇺🇸 or its people, government, or culture. (Including memes criticizing/ridiculing the US president or government)
- Applicant has posted or shared content supporting terrorism or violence (including sharing news about protests or political movements, especially those seen as controversial).
- Applicant has been active in political causes that the U.S. government sees as risky, especially pro-Palestinian activism.
- Applicant has posted about breaking visa rules, like working without permission or planning to stay longer than allowed (including jokes about “never leaving the U.S.” or “working under the table”).
- Applicant has hidden or deleted accounts after listing them.
Process & tools used
- Social media must be set to public; private settings may be deemed “evasion” of transparency
- Officers may capture screenshots, attach them to visa records, or trigger administrative processing under INA 221(g)
- The State Department directs the use of “any available technology,” possibly including automated AI tools
End of “Duration of Status” (D/S); Introduction of Fixed-Term Visas
- NOTE: This new rule is proposed, but not yet fully enacted. More details on terms/limits are still pending DHS regulatory guidance. This change will have the greatest impact on PhD students
- The “Duration of Status” designation (D/S) has been replaced with fixed-term visas, which require active extension or re-application when studies exceed the initial period.
This means
- Under “Duration of Status”, students remain in legal status while actively pursuing their degree.
- With fixed-term, students must request extensions if their program exceeds the visa term, adding unpredictability—for instance, if research or advisor changes prolong completion.
Problems:
- Administrative review delays might jeopardize academic timelines
- Lengthy PhDs may require frequent extensions and justification
- Students may temporarily fall out of status if renewals are delayed
New “Visa Integrity Fee” – $250 (Effective 2026)
- A new non-waivable $250 fee has been added to existing visa fees for most nonimmigrant visas (F, M, J, B, H categories), excluding Visa Waiver Program travelers, Canadians, and diplomats
- Money from this fee will be used to pay for enhanced vetting/security/administrative integrity of visa processes.
- This fee may be reimbursed if visa holders fully comply (depart on time, status changes are completed properly). However, reimbursement mechanisms are not yet fully operational and may take years.
Restoration of in‑person interview requirements — interview waivers limited to same‑class renewals expired ≤ 12 months
- At one time (covid years) students who were renewing their visas (mainly F/J) were sometimes allowed to skip interviews temporarily. (However, even during covid years, first-time student visa applicants were always required to attend interviews.)
- The COVID-19 exceptions have now been eliminated.
- Applicants for renewal must apply within one year of expiry of their visa and they must apply in the same visa class and must not have had any prior refusal.
These new rules and processes have been widely reported and discussed. For further information, see:
https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20250530121433129&utm
https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/interactive/2025/timeline-trump-harvard/
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/121823418.cms
https://indianexpress.com/article/world/us-student-social-media-visa-process-10076231
https://www.ft.com/content/65b48cd9-f1c0-42b3-8a46-8d91dba56f24
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Education_policy_of_the_second_Donald_Trump_administration
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Activist_deportations_in_the_second_Trump_presidency
As things stand now, here are the steps that follow receipt of a university admission letter:
| Applicants for US student visas have to … | ||
| 1 | Prepare the application | For F and M visas, fill out the DS-160 form. For J visas, fill out the DS-2019 form. Gather all required documents, e.g. admission letter, proof of funds, and passport. |
| 2 | Make social media public | Set all listed social media accounts to “public” so officers can see everything. Double-check posts, comments, and photos for anything that could be misunderstood or seen as negative. |
| 3 | Schedule the visa interview | Book an appointment at a U.S. embassy or consulate. Be ready for longer wait times. Bring all documents and be prepared to answer questions about social media. |
| 4 | Go through consul ar review | The officer will review the application, documents, and social media. They may ask about specific posts or comments. If they find anything concerning, they will take notes and screenshots. |
| 5 | Wait | Expect to wait longer than before to get a decision. If the visa is denied, the reason will be conveyed, but it may be hard to appeal. |
| 6 | Reentry and renewal | All the above rules/processes now apply to those who are already students in the United States and need to renew their visa or reenter after travel. |
US visa applicants are familiar with Steps 1, 3, 4, and 6. They now have to give meticulous attention to Step 2, and steel themselves for a longer period of nail-biting thanks to Step 5.
A student who is keen on studying in the USA should do everything possible to “get it right the first time” because if an applicant’s visa is denied (for whatever reason) …
- They can reapply, but they must fix the problems that led to the denial.
- They may need to wait several months before reapplying.
- If an applicant feels the decision was unfair, they can ask for a review, but appeals are rarely successful.
With so much attention being devoted to the individual’s social media presence, visa applicants are asking what they should do to have the best chance of clearing this part of the process. It must be said that there is no official policy that political criticism leads to visa denial, but in practice, subjective judgments can and do enter bureaucratic decisions—especially under opaque or politicized regimes. Immigration officers have wide discretionary power.
Here’s some common sense on social media “acceptability”:
| 1 | Review your social media carefully |
|
| 2 | Don’t try to ‘disappear’ |
|
| 3 | Be honest and consistent |
|
| 4 | Get help from your university |
|
| 5 | Stay informed |
|
6
| Expect delay |
|
Student visa applicants have no choice but to comply with the rules of the US government, but this does not mean that the changes have been accepted by everybody without demur. Many people are raising questions because the new rules have deep implications for a democratic society.
Critics of the new rules and processes have three main concerns:
- Loss of Free Speech: Students are deleting posts and avoiding political topics, which many say hurts academic freedom.
- Stress and Uncertainty: Many students are anxious about what officers might find on their social media.
- Delays and Missed Opportunities: Some students have missed enrollment deadlines or had to defer their studies because of visa delays.
Scrutinising social media posts will have a chilling effect:
Visa applicants may self-censor their past and future speech—not just about U.S. politics but about any topic that could be viewed unfavorably by authorities. With five years (or more) of digital scrutiny, changing political landscapes can turn once-acceptable speech into a liability. What’s “in” or “out” becomes unpredictable. There’s no clear standard for what counts as disqualifying speech. Algorithms and human reviewers alike may misinterpret satire, context, or language nuance.
Many universities are negotiating with the U.S. government to try to make the rules less strict. Schools like Harvard University are working on deals that could help protect students’ rights. University leaders and groups like the American Council on Education are speaking out against the new rules, saying they hurt the United States 🇺🇸’s reputation as a welcoming place for international students. Fanta Aw, CEO of NAFSA: Association of International Educators, has bluntly stated that the pause—and more stringent checks—would cause “unnecessary delays, fuel uncertainty, and damage our reputation as a welcoming destination for global talent.”
Negotiations between universities and the government could lead to changes in the rules by the end of July 2025. Also, legal challenges may force the government to clarify what counts as “hostility” or “political activism.”
On the other hand, opposition to the new rules and processes could push the government to tighten the rules even further on the pretext of “national security in danger”.
When it announced the resumption of visa interviews, the US State Department put out a press note declaring: “Every visa adjudication is a national security decision. The United States must be vigilant during the visa issuance process to ensure that those applying for admission into the United States do not intend to harm Americans and our national interests, and that all applicants credibly establish their eligibility for the visa sought, including that they intend to engage in activities consistent with the terms for their admission.”